Why I won’t use Let’s Encrypt (Sergey Matveev’s homepage)

Once there was a massive amount of text answering that question. But I striped all of it and just left brief list:

All my websites have HTTPS for a long time. Just not forced to be used. Why should they? Because Google said so, I see.
My X.509 certificates are valid. But we may have different trust anchors and rules to check their validity. People live in various jurisdictions and countries, so how can it be possible to have single trusted entity?
DV-certificates are a false sense of security, not preventing your your sessions MitMing (look how jabber.ru was successfully MitMed). Often mentioned Certificate Transparency just helps to detect already happened injury.
But it could still be useful to remember and pin used public key on first connection (TOFU, like in OpenSSH and OpenPGP). It does not matter what exact CA (if any) was used during certificate creation.
Why should my online resources (in)security depend on decisions of USA (or NATO) based organisation? I am citizen of Russian Federation, work for sanctioned (from USA point of view) organisations, tend to visit other sanctioned countries and freely move on territory of my country (all of that is prohibited from western point of view).
I used to use CAcert. But people still complained that their default software (Microsoft, Google, Apple platforms, ...) neither had its certificate, nor any other free CAs, except for the, suddenly appeared and immediately trusted by them, Let’s Encrypt.